ePrivacy Directive (2002/58/EC)

๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ชePrivacy Directive in Sweden

A comprehensive guide to ePrivacy Directive compliance for organisations operating in Sweden. Understand local enforcement, the national data protection authority, key focus areas, and notable enforcement actions.

About ePrivacy Directive

The EU directive governing privacy in electronic communications, covering cookies, direct marketing, traffic data, and the confidentiality of communications โ€” often called the "Cookie Law".

Effective: 31 July 2002Max penalty: Determined by national law (no harmonised maximum) or Varies by member state transposition
Full ePrivacy Directive overview

ePrivacy Directive Enforcement in Sweden

Sweden's IMY (formerly Datainspektionen) has built a reputation for thoughtful, precedent-setting enforcement. Sweden supplemented the GDPR with the Data Protection Act (2018:218) and the Data Protection Ordinance, which include Sweden's strong tradition of public transparency (the principle of public access to official documents). The IMY has been notably active in enforcement against facial recognition technology, camera surveillance, and the use of Google Analytics (finding it incompatible with GDPR following the Schrems II ruling). The IMY coordinates with Swedish municipalities and government agencies on large-scale compliance projects. Sweden sets the digital consent age at 13.

Data Protection Authority

Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten (IMY)

Key Enforcement Focus Areas in Sweden

  • Camera surveillance and facial recognition enforcement
  • Google Analytics and international data transfer rulings
  • Public sector transparency and data protection balance
  • Police and law enforcement data processing
  • Municipal and government agency compliance

Notable Enforcement Actions in Sweden

Spotify AB

โ‚ฌ5,000,000(2023)

Failing to adequately inform users about how their personal data was processed in response to access requests

Klarna Bank AB

โ‚ฌ720,000(2022)

Insufficient transparency about how customer personal data was used and shared

Swedish Police Authority

โ‚ฌ250,000(2021)

Unlawful use of Clearview AI facial recognition technology without legal basis or impact assessment

Skellefteรฅ Municipality

โ‚ฌ18,500(2019)

Piloting facial recognition in a school for attendance monitoring without valid legal basis

Check Your Compliance Status

Take our free assessment to evaluate your organisation's compliance posture. Get a personalised report with actionable recommendations in minutes โ€” no sign-up required.

Start Free Assessment

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. For specific compliance guidance, consult a qualified legal professional in your jurisdiction.

Other Regulations Affecting Sweden